>I would say that people know that 5.2 work and looking at changelogs, >they don't see a real NEED to install 5.3. I personally always have >the newest release though. What happens to their "5.2" the first time they use yum? _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: the 5.2 loaders
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: "'CentOS mailing list'" <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: the 5.2 loaders
- From: "Joseph L. Casale" <JCasale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 10:41:13 -0600
- Accept-language: en-US
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <79495198-1239035627-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-914024094-@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <79495198-1239035627-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-914024094-@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Thread-index: Acm21YvtKUevZw9aTRO+IaPsTLCQIgAANtTg
- Thread-topic: the 5.2 loaders
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: the 5.2 loaders
- From: Sorin Srbu
- Re: the 5.2 loaders
- References:
- Re: the 5.2 loaders
- From: forum
- Re: the 5.2 loaders
- Prev by Date: kernel update doesn't update grub.conf
- Next by Date: Re: the 5.2 loaders
- Previous by thread: Re: the 5.2 loaders
- Next by thread: Re: the 5.2 loaders
- Index(es):
 |