Ralph Angenendt wrote: > rray_1@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > >> What is the downside of sticking with 5.2 >> > > No security fixes. And the cool kids on the block will laugh at you. Look at today's announcement. Now I don't know if the security bugs fixed where in the old 5.2 kernel or only in the newer 5.3 kernel, but it makes that point about staying current with a distro. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: upgrade/no upgrade
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: upgrade/no upgrade
- From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 13:15:06 -0400
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <20090402142220.GP16512@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <alpine.LRH.2.00.0904020853050.6667@rray2>
- References: <20090402142220.GP16512@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090107)
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: upgrade/no upgrade
- From: rray_1
- Re: upgrade/no upgrade
- References:
- upgrade/no upgrade
- From: rray_1
- Re: upgrade/no upgrade
- From: Ralph Angenendt
- upgrade/no upgrade
- Prev by Date: Re: upgrade/no upgrade
- Next by Date: acpid events failing after first suspend
- Previous by thread: Re: upgrade/no upgrade
- Next by thread: Re: upgrade/no upgrade
- Index(es):
 |