Michael A. Peters wrote: > However, I don't believe it needs to be made available by http, CentOS > would probably be in GPL compliance if they distributed it on IBM punch > cards to those who requested it. > FLOPPY DISKS! FOR A MEDIA HANDLING FEE of $5/disk! (thats totally legal per GPL, the recipient is free to redistribute any way they wish) /me ducks, & runs _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Where's v5.3 source RPMs?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Where's v5.3 source RPMs?
- From: John R Pierce <pierce@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2009 11:35:09 -0700
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <49D3B12C.3010800@xxxxxxx>
- References: <200904010706.56459.swsnyder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090401114549.GB7144@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <49D361F7.1090309@xxxxxxxxx> <49D39ED8.2040202@xxxxxxxxxx> <49D3B12C.3010800@xxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302)
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Where's v5.3 source RPMs?
- From: Ralph Angenendt
- Re: Where's v5.3 source RPMs?
- From: William L. Maltby
- Re: Where's v5.3 source RPMs?
- From: Paul Heinlein
- Re: Where's v5.3 source RPMs?
- References:
- Where's v5.3 source RPMs?
- From: Steve Snyder
- Re: Where's v5.3 source RPMs?
- From: Ralph Angenendt
- Re: Where's v5.3 source RPMs?
- From: David Hrbáč
- Re: Where's v5.3 source RPMs?
- From: Fabian Arrotin
- Re: Where's v5.3 source RPMs?
- From: Michael A. Peters
- Where's v5.3 source RPMs?
- Prev by Date: Re: Where's v5.3 source RPMs?
- Next by Date: Re: Where's v5.3 source RPMs?
- Previous by thread: Re: Where's v5.3 source RPMs?
- Next by thread: Re: Where's v5.3 source RPMs?
- Index(es):
 |