Ross Walker wrote: > >> Les has been around a long time and certainly is knowledgeable about >> many forms of UNIX, Linux, Windows and OS X. He seems to enjoy >> fomenting >> discussions about what it is that Red Hat does in general that doesn't >> suit him but given CentOS philosophy to track upstream as closely as >> possible, there is no possibility that it will the distribution that >> will totally satisfy his wants. >> >> I see Ubuntu doing much the same things as Fedora and that probably >> won't be as much of a change as he had hoped but c'est la vie. Ubuntu has both fast turnover versions like fedora and LTS (long term support) versions with an enterprise flavor. >> What he >> actually wants is a distribution that flips the middle finger to all >> GPL >> & Free License restrictions, comes with proprietary video drivers, >> codecs, Sun Java, Adobe stuff, with the latest versions of most >> everything but is stable. I hope that he finds it. I don't believe I've ever mentioned codecs specifically, but I don't want any restrictions on what I or someone else can add, even if it involves drivers or linking to other components. And I do believe Red Hat has done enormous harm to java by shipping something that wasn't java and basically wouldn't work for years in both the fedora and RH distributions. > Hey Les, maybe it's OpenSolaris your looking for. OpenSolaris still seems a little sort on drivers, but yes, I think OpenSolaris with a package manger and a large repository of packages maintained by a friendly community would be ideal. That looks like where Nexenta is heading, but slowly. > You should try it before it becomes OpenAIX. I always thought Sun would be a better match for Apple to round out the client/server mix, but they are from somewhat different planets. Is OpenSolaris still closely controlled by Sun? -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos