Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote: > > I don't know the state of Nexenta but I can live with Indiana. As a > desktop, it was nice to get Nvidia drivers bundled, a working > thunderbird + lightning plugin enabled, working sound (can I repeat > that?), pidgin, openoffice (needless to say), sunstudioexpress, gcc, > printer support, nice crisp looking fonts, compiz if that is your things > and later xchat, ekiga...but no mplayer/vlc (not initially anyway...have > to check with latest), no KDE (although there are packages outside the > repo available), had to download a mp3 plugin for gstream, and learn a > whole load of Solaris stuff unless you use dhcp. I used Solaris eons ago, back when it was expensive and buggy - and I really hate to pay for bugfixes. So, when the cost of a new pentium box with (at the time) freely redistributable RH linux was less than the Solaris update required to fix some things, I switched. But circumstances have changed drastically on both sides now and it may be time to switch back for exactly the same reason. > Either way, it is worth looking at nexenta too. I had this thing for Sun > cc compiled asterisk so I dropped nexenta and moved to Solaris Express > and later Indiana. Nexenta seems like such a good idea, but the team's main focus appears to be on their commercial storage appliance. > No flar or instantly install on thousands of servers support for Indiana > though. For some things, RHEL just stands on top. Maybe I should give > Fedora a try once again. Is there an equivalent to clonezilla that will work with zfs? I'm not particularly thrilled with distro/version specific schemes anyway. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos