Michael A. Peters wrote:
>
>>>> Wow, I really must be out of the loop. New versions of RHEL every 4-6
>>>> months?
>>>>
>>>> Damn. I left Fedora because their release schedule was too frequent ...
>>> The Fedora releases change behavior wildly with each release. The point
>>> of enterprise versions is that they maintain backwards compatibility
>>> even if they add some new features.
>> Yes, the RHEL releases are akin to the service packs of MS Windows. You'll
>> get some new features and a few changes, but it'll still be the same basic
>> system. Fedora releases are more like moving from Windows XP to Vista, or
>> more precisely, from a reasonably mature Windows XP to a Beta release of
>> Vista.
>>
>
> My comment was joke - RHEL releases don't come out every 4-6 months (not
> for a major version anyway).
>
> I do wish though that EPEL had a better policy, there have been several
> occasions when I have had had to recompile something of my own for the
> simple reason that EPEL versioned a shared library.
>
> The Firefox 1.5 to 3.0 move in RHEL was at least understandable, there
> was good reason for that, but some of the EPEL changes - I think they
> leave it to the discretion of the packager but it's annoying.
But its still a lot better than nothing if you can grab a src rpm and
'rpmbuild --rebuild' it to get a working version.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
