mbneto wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> There were some unusual situations with core developers this time
> around.
>
>
> This is something that we should address don't you think?
Well, Karanbir has already weighed in on the thread. If he needs help
I'm sure he knows where to ask.
> Some additional resources could help but since CentOS developers are
> unpaid, raising money for human resources may not be the correct
> approach. Beefing up the buildsystem has been noted as something
> desirable.
>
>
> I think that this is somewhat contradictory. If the developers are
> unpaid we should be considering at least some help (paid one) so we can
> expect a more regular approach not a best effort one.
Hiring and managing employees has substantial overhead involved. I
doubt this is worthwhile.
>
> And who is going to develop such nice automation? There has been
> regular news:
>
> <http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=18223&forum=37>
>
>
> Well, there is no need to automation. This paid help would send one
> email per day with the summary.
If you need faster updates or more support than CentOS can provide,
please consider RHEL as an option. CentOS would not exist without them.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
