Kai Schaetzl wrote: > - as the MX is the same as your domain name you do not need an MX It is good to always have an MX. > - having four ns records all point to the same IP is just, uhm, pointless Can make it easier to separate workloads and move them to different servers later. //Morten _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Mail delivery failing with 450
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Mail delivery failing with 450
- From: Morten Torstensen <morten@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2009 19:50:36 +0100
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <VA.00003705.020aa25f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <1236431939.12846.25.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49B27046.4040309@xxxxxxxxx> <1236442021.12846.33.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <VA.00003705.020aa25f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)
- References:
- Mail delivery failing with 450
- From: James Pifer
- Re: Mail delivery failing with 450
- From: Joebstl Thomas
- Re: Mail delivery failing with 450
- From: James Pifer
- Re: Mail delivery failing with 450
- From: Kai Schaetzl
- Mail delivery failing with 450
- Prev by Date: Re: Creating an alternitive install CD for CentOS 5.2 (w/ patched mkinitrd)
- Next by Date: Re: Mail delivery failing with 450
- Previous by thread: Re: Mail delivery failing with 450
- Next by thread: Re: Mail delivery failing with 450
- Index(es):
 |