Noob Centos Admin wrote: > This again reflects my original experience with SELinux: massive > resource hog and this is just a lowly loaded webserver. Naturally it > seems to me that this doesn't seem like it should be the norm. You do not need setroubleshoot to run selinux, so your comment up there says nothing. SELinux itself is not a resource hog at all (and which version are you running? Is that box up to date?). Ralph
Attachment:
pgptz176I1UCa.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
