One nfs server per user.
I think it is still nfsv3, I will consider upgrading to v4.
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 1:47 AM, Rainer Duffner <rainer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Am 27.02.2009 um 01:44 schrieb Joe Barjo:
What's your NFS-server, BTW?
> I'd also like to test gfs for a 30 nodes cluster with sge.
> Tasks are often quite short, files are also quite small. Job rate
> can be quite high (can reach 10 to 20/second)
> We actualy use NFS under centos4.7 and experience coherency problems.
> I tested AFS, lustre, glusterFS. All showed too much overhead with
> small files, and less performance than nfs.
>
> The coherency problem seems related to the ext3 timestamp resolution
> (1 second), and the poor NFS cache system. It is not coherent even
> with the noac (no attribute cache option)
>
> First GFS test on 6 nodes (with gnbd) were ok, but there had been
> unexplained kernel panics (even when not working) that prevented
> further tests.
>
> I will try to upgrade the cluster to a more recent distribution and
> test GFS on 30 nodes.
>
Rainer
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
