Re: Keepalive...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



> vrrp_instance VI_1 {
>     state MASTER          ### BACKUP on the backup ###
>     interface eth0
>     lvs_sync_daemon_interface eth1
>     virtual_router_id 51
>     priority 100                 ### 99 on the backup ###
>     advert_int 1
>     smtp_alert
>     virtual_ipaddress {
>         192.168.16.123
>     }
> }

Suddenly, I went a bit further...
I saw a different (from the outdated doc) config on the web and tried it succesfully:

     virtual_ipaddress {
         192.168.16.123/32 brd 192.168.31.255 scope global
     }

And get these extra bits:

Feb 20 16:19:56 lvs1 Keepalived_vrrp: VRRP_Instance(VI_1) Transition to MASTER STATE
Feb 20 16:19:57 lvs1 Keepalived_vrrp: VRRP_Instance(VI_1) Entering MASTER STATE
Feb 20 16:19:57 lvs1 Keepalived_vrrp: VRRP_Instance(VI_1) setting protocol VIPs.
Feb 20 16:19:57 lvs1 Keepalived_vrrp: VRRP_Instance(VI_1) Sending gratuitous ARPs on eth0 for 192.168.16.123
Feb 20 16:19:57 lvs1 Keepalived_vrrp: Remote SMTP server [127.0.0.1:25] connected.
Feb 20 16:19:57 lvs1 Keepalived_vrrp: SMTP alert successfully sent.

2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000
    link/ether 00:04:23:9e:f3:74 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet 192.168.28.226/20 brd 192.168.31.255 scope global eth0
    inet 192.168.16.123/32 brd 192.168.31.255 scope global eth0
    inet6 fe80::204:23ff:fe9e:f374/64 scope link 
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever

But not sure both lvs are talking vrrp to each other; tcpdump does not intercept anything...

JD


      

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux