> vrrp_instance VI_1 {
> state MASTER ### BACKUP on the backup ###
> interface eth0
> lvs_sync_daemon_interface eth1
> virtual_router_id 51
> priority 100 ### 99 on the backup ###
> advert_int 1
> smtp_alert
> virtual_ipaddress {
> 192.168.16.123
> }
> }
Suddenly, I went a bit further...
I saw a different (from the outdated doc) config on the web and tried it succesfully:
virtual_ipaddress {
192.168.16.123/32 brd 192.168.31.255 scope global
}
And get these extra bits:
Feb 20 16:19:56 lvs1 Keepalived_vrrp: VRRP_Instance(VI_1) Transition to MASTER STATE
Feb 20 16:19:57 lvs1 Keepalived_vrrp: VRRP_Instance(VI_1) Entering MASTER STATE
Feb 20 16:19:57 lvs1 Keepalived_vrrp: VRRP_Instance(VI_1) setting protocol VIPs.
Feb 20 16:19:57 lvs1 Keepalived_vrrp: VRRP_Instance(VI_1) Sending gratuitous ARPs on eth0 for 192.168.16.123
Feb 20 16:19:57 lvs1 Keepalived_vrrp: Remote SMTP server [127.0.0.1:25] connected.
Feb 20 16:19:57 lvs1 Keepalived_vrrp: SMTP alert successfully sent.
2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000
link/ether 00:04:23:9e:f3:74 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 192.168.28.226/20 brd 192.168.31.255 scope global eth0
inet 192.168.16.123/32 brd 192.168.31.255 scope global eth0
inet6 fe80::204:23ff:fe9e:f374/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
But not sure both lvs are talking vrrp to each other; tcpdump does not intercept anything...
JD
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
