Jerry Geis wrote: > after running "hwclock --debug" the two files you mentioned above > did not have anything extra added. Just curious, you are running this on real hardware right not a virtual machine? nate _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: question on hwclock
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: question on hwclock
- From: "nate" <centos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 23:26:40 -0800 (PST)
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <499D5695.3080002@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <499B6DAC.8060808@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <499C0532.5030508@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <499D5695.3080002@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.9a
- References:
- question on hwclock
- From: Jerry Geis
- Re: question on hwclock
- From: Jerry Geis
- Re: question on hwclock
- From: Jerry Geis
- question on hwclock
- Prev by Date: Re: CentOS 5 video driver for Intel DG965WHMKR at 1680X1050 resolution?
- Next by Date: Re: CentOS 5 video driver for Intel DG965WHMKR at 1680X1050 resolution?
- Previous by thread: Re: question on hwclock
- Next by thread: Re: question on hwclock
- Index(es):
 |