On Tuesday 17 February 2009, Sven Kaptein | MARS websolutions wrote: > > Undoubtedly someone else with more experience with GFS will give you an > > answer, but to me this makes me think ip_conntrack stuff gets cleared > > out and sessions have to reestablish themselves. > > > > Ray > > Ray, > > Thanks for your fast answer and getting me into the right direction. This > sounds like a possible solution, but I have no clue how to fix it. I > googled already a lot on ip_conntrack + gfs, but don't see a possible > solution coming up. > > Can someone/you please help me a little bit more with the issue? You could allow traffic more broadly between your GFS-servers. Pro: packets will not depend on conntrack for delivery. Con: large hole in your firewall that you may not be able to live with. /Peter > Thanks a lot! > Sven
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
