Re: Practical experience with NTLM/Windows Integrated Authentication [Apache]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 7:33 PM, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
<m3freak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 08:05 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote:
>> Maybe kerberos authentication?
>>
>> I have winbind authentication working here but I have yet to get
>> kerberos working to get SSO on Linux desktops.
>
> Isn't winbind enough?  Afterall, winbind gets the kerberos ticket when
> the user logs in.
>
> What's the difference between kerberos auth and winbind auth?

The difference is that winbind authentication is NTLM and it's good
for that endpoint only, but it can't be forwarded on to other services
for a SSO experience (unless there is an NTLM session cache and the
applications are written to use it ala Windows, but it is insecure).

-Ross
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux