Re: tinydns/djbdns opinion poll

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



James B. Byrne wrote on Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:31:39 -0500 (EST):

> I cannot answer whether this situation is still the case, and I know
> that it was not always the case, but on the last but one update to
> bind my configuration files were all renamed to .rpmsave and there
> were no .rpmnew files created, only the default config files left in
> place of the old ones.

Hm, when I installed bind last year for providing caching and some 
internal name resolution in the LAN, it didn't install many config files. 
I had to make up the main files by my own. What I did to get this setup 
was to install bind, bind-chroot and caching-nameserver (and remove it 
later as I saw I didn't need it). After that I saw at least two updates, 
but no changes to config files.

Kai

-- 
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com



_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux