on 2-12-2009 11:24 AM Akemi Yagi spake the following: > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Scott Silva <ssilva-m4n3GYAQT2lWk0Htik3J/w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> on 2-12-2009 3:08 AM CentOS User spake the following: >>> Seeing upstream has an update for glibc >>> http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-0052.html >>> I rebuilt the glibc-2.3.4-2.41.el4_7.1.src.rpm and >>> it produced the following rpms :- >>> >>> glibc-2.3.4-2.41.el4_7.1.i386.rpm >>> glibc-common-2.3.4-2.41.el4_7.1.i386.rpm >>> glibc-debuginfo-2.3.4-2.41.el4_7.1.i386.rpm >>> glibc-debuginfo-common-2.3.4-2.41.el4_7.1.i386.rpm >>> glibc-devel-2.3.4-2.41.el4_7.1.i386.rpm >>> glibc-headers-2.3.4-2.41.el4_7.1.i386.rpm >>> glibc-profile-2.3.4-2.41.el4_7.1.i386.rpm >>> glibc-utils-2.3.4-2.41.el4_7.1.i386.rpm >>> nptl-devel-2.3.4-2.41.el4_7.1.i386.rpm >>> nscd-2.3.4-2.41.el4_7.1.i386.rpm >>> >>> Is it okay to install all of them or should i skip the >>> debuginfo rpms? Is an official CentOS update going to be >>> made of the glibc from Red Hat? >> If those were released with or after RHEL 5.3, then they will come out with or >> after CentOS 5.3. Soon to be released to a mirror near you! > > Those packages will eventually appear in CentOS mirrors (except they > are for CentOS-4, not -5). :-D That is what I get for working on a server and answering mail at the same time! Is it Friday yet? ;-P > > The bug fixes (marked RHBA) may not get a high priority as security > fixes (marked RHSA) do. So, they may lag a bit when the developers > are tied up with more urgent tasks. > > You can see what you current have on your system by: > > rpm -qa glibc\* nptl\* nscd > > That will give you a hint as to which packages you want to update. > > Akemi -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't!!!!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
