Re: clustering and load balancing Apache

[Jure Pečar <pegasus@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:50:34 -0800Florin Andrei <florin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I was just curious about performance comparisons between different types > of load balancers in general.
It's hard to say ... you usualy use load balancers to achieve higheravailability and put as little as possible in the way of traffic when youwant performance (save for the most expensive hw load balancers).
For Apache, I had great success with mod_backhand, available atwww.backhand.org iirc. It's one of the smartest balancers, but onlyavailable for apache 1.3. I've heard 1.3 is still faster than 2.x inmany cases.
But I'm nginx only now for a few years now ;)

-- 
Jure Pečarhttp://jure.pecar.org_______________________________________________CentOS mailing listCentOS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos