Rainer Duffner пишет:> Sergej Kandyla schrieb:> >> Hi,>> apache is good as backend server for dynamic applications.>> You could use something like nginx, haproxy as frontend for balancing >> multiple backend servers.>> I'm using nginx. This light web server could serve many thousand >> concurrent connections! It works great!>>>> look at>> http://wiki.codemongers.com/NginxLoadBalanceExample>> http://blog.kovyrin.net/2006/08/25/haproxy-load-balancer/lang/en/>> http://blog.kovyrin.net/2006/05/18/nginx-as-reverse-proxy/lang/en/>> and http://highscalability.com/>>>> >> >> Yup. NGINX is probably the fastest way to serve content nowadays.> But content has to be static and be available as a file (AFAIK) directly> to NGINX.> No, nginx could serve any kind of content via ngx_http_proxy_module module http://wiki.codemongers.com/NginxHttpProxyModuleFor example I'm using nginx as reverse proxy for tomcat servers\applications.Also I've wrote some article about using nginx in shared hosting sphere. Look at http://directadmin.com/forum/showthread.php?t=27344
When content located on the some server (or via NAS\SAN) nginx could serve this content directly using some efficient mechanisms like sendfilehttp://wiki.codemongers.com/NginxHttpCoreModule#sendfile
For serving static content nginx even more times efficient than ftp!!On some servers with low-power hardware like celeron\sempron processors and 512M ram I have upload rate nearly 100mbit, It's not limit for nginx, its a limit of sata disks and chanel to that servers :)
As for load-balancing:http://wiki.codemongers.com/NginxHttpUpstreamModulehttp://barry.wordpress.com/2008/04/28/load-balancer-update/
> There's also "varnish", if you can't meet the above provision easily.>>>
_______________________________________________CentOS mailing listCentOS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
