As many people have stated in this thread, 3ware and Areca make some
good hardware RAID solutions.
Software RAID using mdadm works too, quite well, I might add. I was one
of those people who stayed away from software RAID in linux, thinking it
was too complicated and difficult, I was wrong. It's dead easy to do,
and expanding your disks can be done on the fly (if you have a SATA
controller that supports hotplugging as many these days do.) Perhaps the
best thing about software RAID, in my opinion, is that it's light enough
on the machine that a PIII server can be reading/writing to the array at
10MB/s.
Now you might say, 10MB/s, who cares? That's small stuff. But, when
that's the load the network infrastructure at this location was designed
to handle, you don't need anything higher performance.
Just my two cents.
-Hal
Christopher Chan wrote:
> Paolo Supino wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> Last week I had a lengthy thread in which someone indicated the my SIL
>> card is a FRAID (don't know if F stands for the F word or Fake, though
>> it doesn't really matter). I want to replace the controller with a
>> controller that Linux will see the RAID1 group as a single HD and not
>> multiple HDs as it happens with the SIL controller. Recommendations anyone?
>>
>>
>
> Adaptec RAID 2405, 3ware, Areca
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
>
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
