Scott Silva wrote: > on 2-3-2009 2:35 PM Thom Paine spake the following: >> Would this be a good way to go to update to 5? >> >> I would consider this. I have a couple of 3 boxes I'd like to get to 5. >> > It is never recommended to upgrade major versions. You might get away with it, > and you might spend even more time chasing problems. > Except maybe on OpenSolaris (personal experience) and from what I hear Debian (that does not mean nor include Ubuntu). /me scurries back to hiding hole. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: RHEL -> CentOS
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: RHEL -> CentOS
- From: Christopher Chan <christopher.chan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 08:31:56 +0800
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <gmahej$ku0$4@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <498898EA.9050907@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.LRH.2.00.0902032021270.3785@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <9e1340d20902031435t554e08e1xdb05bd6903f08772@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <gmahej$ku0$4@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080908)
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RHEL -> CentOS
- From: Scott Silva
- Re: RHEL -> CentOS
- References:
- RHEL -> CentOS
- From: John R Pierce
- Re: RHEL -> CentOS
- From: Dag Wieers
- Re: RHEL -> CentOS
- From: Thom Paine
- Re: RHEL -> CentOS
- From: Scott Silva
- RHEL -> CentOS
- Prev by Date: Re: /etc/X11/xorg.conf question
- Next by Date: Re: RHEL -> CentOS
- Previous by thread: Re: RHEL -> CentOS
- Next by thread: Re: RHEL -> CentOS
- Index(es):
 |