MHR wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 8:01 AM, Charles E Campbell Jr
> <charles.e.campbell@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Charles E Campbell Jr wrote:
>>
>>> Hello!
>>>
>>> I like using Seamonkey; I have v1.1.13 on Centos. It works with
>>> flash-plugin-10.0.12.36-release.i386.rpm.
>>>
>>>
> :
>
>>> So -- has anyone gotten 1.1.15 Seamonkey working with the latest flash
>>> plugin on Centos? I don't want to update Seamonkey on the Centos box if
>>> its not working.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> One thing -- that should've been v1.1.14 instead of ...15 above.
>>
>>
>
> I use the beta version of SM 2.0, which is (technically): Mozilla/5.0
> (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.1b1pre)
> Gecko/20080924175508 SeaMonkey/2.0a1
>
> You can get it from mozilla.org - it works for me really well, but I
> also run on an x86_64 machine in 64-bit mode (and I think the 2.0a1
> pre-release works better than 1.<anything>). There are a (very) few
> things that don't quite work right, but most of them are Windows-only
> features (like some of the online TV shows that don't use flash any
> more).
>
Sounds like a good idea; I'll try it.
Regards,
Chip Campbell
--
someday I'll have a good signature, I'm sure of it...
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
