On Wednesday 28 January 2009 13:56:10 cent osserver wrote: > On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 8:33 AM, Ned Slider <ned@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Was that REALLY called for? Couldn't you have simply filed it in > > /dev/null? > > Yes, I should have. I gave into impulse in a weak moment and then > REALLY screwed up by not noticing I was replying to the list and not > the individual. (Most lists have reply-to set to the individual, not > the list) > So it would have been all right if you had insulted him directly, would it? Grow up! The only good thing is he probably never saw it, as some of us help people off-list with things like this. Anne
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
