On Jan 28, 2009, at 10:00 AM, Brian Mathis wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 8:56 AM, cent osserver
> <centoserver@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 8:33 AM, Ned Slider <ned@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>> Was that REALLY called for? Couldn't you have simply filed it in /
>>> dev/null?
>>
>> Yes, I should have. I gave into impulse in a weak moment and then
>> REALLY screwed up by not noticing I was replying to the list and not
>> the individual. (Most lists have reply-to set to the individual,
>> not
>> the list)
>>
>> Sorry.
>
> If this is how you reply to people, ESPECIALLY privately, and during
> weak moments, your Internet privileges are hereby revoked. Your
> status as a decent human being isn't looking good either.
>
> Get control over yourself. Also realize that if you were to reply to
> someone like this in private, you are doing more damage to the
> community than if you did it in public. At least if you do it in
> public, we can rip you apart for it. A mailing list is not there to
> provide you with punching bags for when you have a bad day.
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
The information IS in the headers, but many email programs don't show
the full headers, extracting only the information that many people
want (subject, TO:, CC:, etc). So if you aren't aware of it being
hidden in the headers, you may not notice it.
I generally look at the footers, when present, to see how to
unsubscribe. And many people don't even go that far. CentOS probably
should add just a little more to their footers, such as a note that
the link provided is also to unsubscribe.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
