> did anyone give insight into the OP question, or is this just email > bashing class 099 ? It was answered, thanks. The offending disclaimer message is gone now. How does this Sig file look gentlemen? -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Support for i7 architecture?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Support for i7 architecture?
- From: "Michael St. Laurent" <mikes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:03:48 -0800
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- References: <3BF93070B3D1B047BA7ABF612958950D04E83FCB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090122222457.GA32193@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx><3BF93070B3D1B047BA7ABF612958950D04E83FD5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx><4979040F.5020504@xxxxxxx> <EDB666CE9ADF42FDA39D0E22A1DEBBB8@msys1>
- Thread-index: Acl860yJlIX3clYjTnWxYDKi4lKeUgAhgSMQAKHv4qA=
- Thread-topic: Support for i7 architecture?
- References:
- Support for i7 architecture?
- From: Michael St. Laurent
- Re: Support for i7 architecture?
- From: Tru Huynh
- Re: Support for i7 architecture?
- From: Michael St. Laurent
- Re: Support for i7 architecture?
- From: Miguel Medalha
- Re: Support for i7 architecture?
- From: RobertH
- Support for i7 architecture?
- Prev by Date: Re: PHP 5.2 on Centos4
- Next by Date: [OT] Anyone on-list using a Barracuda Spam Firewall?
- Previous by thread: Re: Support for i7 architecture?
- Next by thread: Re: Support for i7 architecture?
- Index(es):
 |