> > > KeepAliveTimeout 150 > >reduce this to 10 or 5. > > > Kai > > -- > Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Kai, what do you think about the "general Timeout it is set to 300 ive never much thought about it, yet should we be consider and possible reduce that one too? - rh _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Apache Server Tuning for Performance
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: "'CentOS mailing list'" <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Apache Server Tuning for Performance
- From: "RobertH" <roberth@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:26:41 -0800
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <VA.00003642.0806113f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <29e045b80901201039j1c0a2843w7deab53f0c7de348@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <VA.00003642.0806113f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Thread-index: Acl7mqdfm97PYofLS8qeI1NRm7DoZwAY10cg
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Apache Server Tuning for Performance
- From: Kai Schaetzl
- Re: Apache Server Tuning for Performance
- References:
- Apache Server Tuning for Performance
- From: linux-crazy
- Re: Apache Server Tuning for Performance
- From: Kai Schaetzl
- Apache Server Tuning for Performance
- Prev by Date: help with udev rules needed
- Next by Date: Re: Firefox error msg.
- Previous by thread: Re: Apache Server Tuning for Performance
- Next by thread: Re: Apache Server Tuning for Performance
- Index(es):
 |