On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Ned Slider wrote: > Dag Wieers wrote: >> On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Akemi Yagi wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Dag Wieers <dag@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> Let us know whether we can improve this page to your benefit. >>> And firmware for the iwl* drivers will become available from RPMforge >>> as soon as Dag has a chance to push them... :-D >>> >>> Thanks to Ned for providing them. >> >> Yes, they will be available in RPM format by tomorrow. >> >> Back to our regular programme... > > Thanks Dag - you're a star! A dying star ;-) Anyway, looking at the SPEC files I noticed for iwl3945 and iwl4956 firmware not the latest version have been used. Is there a good reason for it or just an oversight ? If there is a reason we should state so in the SPEC file so people retain that information. PS Are you sure you don't want RPMforge commit access ? -- -- dag wieers, dag@xxxxxxxxxx, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors] _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos