R P Herrold wrote: > On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, nate wrote: > >> I would not use CentOS at all if for anything else than Oracle >> won't support it. Oracle linux is a clone of RHEL and I believe >> is pretty cheap, otherwise RHEL 5 Advanced. > > ummm .. a recent UBL was a rebuild of CentOS SRPMs Doesn't matter if even the RPMS are exactly the same, at least to me. Use something the vendor will support for a product that costs as much as Oracle does, especially if the additional costs are minimal. Unless Oracle supports CentOS these days, it's been about a year since I used Oracle. Did a bunch of searches and couldn't find the list of supported linux versions and patch levels. nate _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos