Warren, Eucke wrote:
> I do see the manual fix for it and will be testing that
> shortly. I am,
> however, dealing with a fairly rigid internal legal
> department that may
> not welcome a "fix" that's not
> "official". So I have two questions:
>
> 1) Is there an "official" or "accepted"
> way to inquire about the status
> of an open bug?
> 2) With regard to bug 0002329 is this something that has to
> be fixed
> upstream so it filters down to centos?
>
What company is this that doesn't wan't to pay for a support
contract for RHEL but insists on using CentOS but requires
"official fixes" only?
1. Can you name and shame this comapany it will make good reading
on teh web.
2. Consider paying for RHEL so that you can actually get
"official support" and can raise support tickets.
3. You probably don't understand what CentOS is or who is supposed
to use it.
Regards,
Vandaman.
-------------------------------------------------------
Report another spam?
Your average reporting time is: 3 hours; Great!
---- ---- ---- ---- ----
noob detector -> 15 noobs top-posting.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
