On Wed, January 7, 2009 7:19 pm, Craig White wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 18:54 -0500, Bo Lynch wrote:
>
>>
>> So are you required to run zimbras release of these packages?
>>
>> If you are forced to use them then how delayed are the releases.
>> Are you able to use something other than amavis and clam for scanning??
>> We
>> use a product called VAMS released by central command for spam and
>> antivirus on our mail server currently. These guys are very generous
>> with
>> pricing when it comes to educational facilities in case anyone is
>> looking.
> ----
> zimbra is pretty much of a closed box in that they have already decided
> what / how / where you will run stuff and no, you can't run anything
> other than the way they have decided it unless you decide to put a box
> in front of the zimbra server to receive mail first before you pass it
> to the zimbra box.
>
> zimbra is also not a lightweight system by any means.
>
> There are a lot of schools running Horde/IMP/etc.
>
> Craig
>
I have been looking at both and the thing that concerns me with zimbra is
the closed box scenario and the EULA. I was assuming that its was license
was going to be GPL. But its YPL Yahoo. Does anyone think this is
something to be concerned with in the future? Meaning down the road zimbra
closes its open source edition?
What does Horde really lack from zimbra?
Bo
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
