Re: Update to Centos 5 anaconda kickstart %post bug?

["Lanny Marcus" <lmmailinglists@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Warren, Eucke <EWarren@xxxxxxx> wrote:
<snip>
> I appreciate the response.  If you recall I did post the link so it's a
> safe assumption that I read the page and understood it's content.  What
> I'm after is whether there's any other information channel that might
> not be so obvious for seeing if there might be action coming up for an
> particular issue.  Being in a highly regulated industry the legal
> department has a tough job.  I work within the guidelines they set.
>
>> If Karanbir thinks it merits an upstream bug report, I'm almost sure
> he might do that, if the original bug
>> poster doesn't. It "might" be fixed by the time
>> 5.3 comes out, but do you want to wait?
>
> I am restricted to 5.1 as approved by legal.  5.2 is not approved so 5.3
> isn't an option either.

Does that mean that your Legal Department does not permit you  to
upgrade your box, to get the latest packages, issued for Security &
Stability reasons? 5.1, as you are well aware, is not the latest and
greatest.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos