Re: Hierarchial storage management or automated archival to tape

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]




>>> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:37 AM, in message
<77c4f5c60901080737ka0ee2fbr7f6badc9fc48e4f3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Bent Terp
<bent@xxxxxxx> wrote: 
> Hi list!
> 
> While regular backup solutions like amanda or bacula are very good at
> their job, ie keeping point2point copies of the files currently on
> disk, I find them less suited for archiving - having unused files move
> to tape in duplo and stay there until requested. I've even read of
> multi-tier solutions - move to slower disks after a week and further
> on to tape after a month.
> 
> Does anyone have some experience or suggestions for this? The project
> will deal with ~100 TB of growth per year, most files somewhere
> between 2 and 50 GB.
> 
> Yes, it can be done with everything in one filesystem, but I'm
> concerned about running a full backup every month of 500 TB ;-) Not to
> mention the time required for recovery in case the filesys crashes....
> 
> BR Bent


We use SAM-FS to do just that here in the libraries. 
http://opensolaris.org/os/project/samqfs/What_are_QFS_and_SAM/

It was open sourced last year. Not a simple tool to implement but it does work as advertised.


Tony Placilla <aplacilla@xxxxxxx>
Sr. UNIX Systems Administrator
The Sheridan Libraries
Johns Hopkins University
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux