on 1-7-2009 10:00 AM Kai Schaetzl spake the following: > Vandaman wrote on Wed, 7 Jan 2009 17:31:36 +0000 (GMT): > >> Why would the admin of the un-named repo include two versions >> unless one could be an update/bugfix? > > So, what? Isn't he entitled to say no to an update if he knows there is a > problem on his setup with it? > > Kai > Yes, but yum needs a little coercion to ignore that update. You would have to exclude that package after you got the older one installed so it didn't update. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't!!!!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
