On Dec 29, 2008, at 7:09 AM, John R Pierce wrote: > Bill Campbell wrote: >> I would go with Opensolaris. > > > for a dedicated production storage server, I would go with Solaris 10. > unless there's some specific feature/capability you need thats only in > OpenSolaris. Totally agree. Solaris 10 is known for its stability. OpenSolaris includes some advanced capabilities that will be included into Solaris (especially on zfs and kernel side). Solaris : OpenSolaris = CentOS : Fedora (more or less...) d _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: ZFS on Linux
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: ZFS on Linux
- From: Davide Cittaro <davide.cittaro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 08:54:32 +0100
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <4958699D.1090108@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <1cbd6f830812281016j1989c41an749fb8336c1860c6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <683C46F6-41F3-4603-838B-A74ED75D97D7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20081229055730.GA20931@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4958699D.1090108@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ZFS on Linux
- From: Tony Placilla
- Re: ZFS on Linux
- References:
- ZFS on Linux
- From: Mag Gam
- Re: ZFS on Linux
- From: Davide Cittaro
- Re: ZFS on Linux
- From: Bill Campbell
- Re: ZFS on Linux
- From: John R Pierce
- ZFS on Linux
- Prev by Date: Re: ZFS on Linux
- Next by Date: Re: cluster - ip address lost when service stopped
- Previous by thread: Re: ZFS on Linux
- Next by thread: Re: ZFS on Linux
- Index(es):
 |