Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > I have never liked the SSLvpn architecture. Never really liked the SSL > handshake; just too chatty. I wear my biases quite plainly on my arm > sleeve (I chaired the IPsec workgroup during the time the RFCs came > out). You want security, go with IPsec. Even ESP NULL gives you per > packet authentication and thus proof of server and client. Just pay the > price for IKE, which I never liked. Part of the reason I invented HIP.... But ssl vpns work though just about any firewall/proxy/nat that already permit https. Traversing those can be painful or impossible for ipsec. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos