Re: regarding vpn server for 1500 clients

[Dhaval Thakar <dhaval.thakar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Matej Cepl wrote:
> On 2008-12-17, 08:37 GMT, NiftyClusters T Mitchell wrote:
>   
>> It is possible that dedicated Cisco hardware solutions will 
>> scale better.
>>     
>
> Your mileage may vary, but I have terrible experience with Linux 
> Cisco VPN clients, so I would strongly suggest OpenVPN. Of 
> course, I don't know anything about needs for so huge 
> installation etc. -- the only I have is very bad experience with 
> Cisco VPN as its user.
>   
thanks for the reply.
I need vpn server to provide software connectivity to the clients.
This is trading software.

I have installed & used OpenVpn on my test setup.
It is working fine.

I prefer non-encryption vpn.
If I use openvpn, it will require more processing power than poptop.
I guess creating backup server might become difficult as it works on ssl 
cert. cert created on server1 might not work with server2. Whereas in 
poptop I need to copy single file (chap-secrets).

I am trying testing poptop, if there any better vpn server available 
kindly let me know.




_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos