on 12-17-2008 9:43 AM Dag Wieers spake the following: > On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, Spiro Harvey wrote: > >> I'm still curious about the discrepencies in the version numbers, does >> yours come up with conflicting numbers on the splash screen? > > I can only confirm that you are right on that one as well :-) > Also true for RHEL BTW. > >>From the vi --debug output it seems obvious that vi reports the highest > included patch in the version. So what I think happened is that Red Hat > started off from 7.0.109 and added patches upto 237. > > Still confusing though. > Or at least added a patch that erroneously changed the version label to that version. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't!!!!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
