On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 7:05 AM, William L. Maltby <CentOS4Bill@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Ran yum update this A.M. Got this. Is it a problem for rpmforge, CentOS > or just me? Maybe not a problem at all? Bill: I have PUP running and this morning got the alert that updates were available. I had PUP (which I believe is a front end forYUM/RPM) install the 3 packages, without any issues, on this CentOS 5.2 (32 bit) box. I wonder why it went awry for you, when you did it manually.... Lanny _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Yum messages: /usr/lib/liblzo.so.1 is not a symbolic link
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Yum messages: /usr/lib/liblzo.so.1 is not a symbolic link
- From: "Lanny Marcus" <lmmailinglists@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 15:42:56 -0500
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <1229429139.3936.5.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <1229429139.3936.5.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Yum messages: /usr/lib/liblzo.so.1 is not a symbolic link
- From: William L. Maltby
- Re: Yum messages: /usr/lib/liblzo.so.1 is not a symbolic link
- References:
- Yum messages: /usr/lib/liblzo.so.1 is not a symbolic link
- From: William L. Maltby
- Yum messages: /usr/lib/liblzo.so.1 is not a symbolic link
- Prev by Date: Re: Yum messages: /usr/lib/liblzo.so.1 is not a symbolic link
- Next by Date: Re: cpuspeed problems with 5.2 and 2.6.18-92.1.18 kernel revision
- Previous by thread: Re: Yum messages: /usr/lib/liblzo.so.1 is not a symbolic link
- Next by thread: Re: Yum messages: /usr/lib/liblzo.so.1 is not a symbolic link
- Index(es):
 |