Re: nfs slow?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



John Kordash wrote:
>> 2.) Use TCP, UDP Transmits are often slow these days. (mount
>> option tcp)
>
> Hmm, care to share any references for this?  I'd be reaching for NFS over
> TCP in a long-haul type environment, but would run it over UDP otherwise.

At least in my case, both of the vendors I am using for high
performance NFS (BlueArc, and Exanet) have tcp as a best
practice. Exanet actually runs on top of CentOS 4.4 though
does not use the linux NFS stack.

These are the options I use for Exanet:
rw,bg,hard,intr,tcp,nfsvers=3,timeo=2,retrans=10,rsize=32768,wsize=32768

These are the options I use for BlueArc:
rw,bg,hard,intr,proto=tcp,nfsvers=3,timeo=600,rsize=32768,wsize=32768

Exanet is an active-active cluster, the BlueArcs are not configured
in any sort of cluster. Planning on retiring the BlueArcs very
soon as they are about to be end of life.

nate


_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux