Ross Walker wrote: > On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 9:00 AM, Chan Chung Hang Christopher > <christopher.chan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Xen _hypervisor_ will not make it into the kernel, because there's no point >>> in that. It's not part of Xen design. >>> >>> Linux support for Xen hypervisor is already in Linux kernel. >>> >> Whatever. From the last few months of testing with Xen, I really could >> care less about running anything on it. >> >> I like the comfy feeling I get when I see that I have one less place to >> hit for troubleshooting/compromising with the kvm solution. > > It's most obvious you have no idea what you are talking about, so if > you prefer Ubuntu over CentOS then please move along, we need no > trolls here. > Troll? I have been on this list for over four years. I have posted under Feizhou and one or two other addresses as I moved jobs. So I only messed with XEN in the last few months. FYI, I am using it for DESKTOPS. Not servers. This is not a matter of preferring Ubuntu. It is one of NO CHOICE. I know next to nothing about Debian/Ubuntu configuration files nor am I familiar with dpkg or apt as I am with rpm and yum. You think I want to move over for fun? Let us see you try getting accelerated 3D/video support for X and Xen working together and then add a multi-seat configuration on top of that. Sorry you don't like my complaining that I cannot do this or that on RHEL5 for desktop purposes but I have a school to support here, not a cluster of mail/web/storage/file servers. Troll he calls me. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos