On Saturday 29 November 2008 12:39:10 you wrote:
> Anne -- You need to provide a context. What
application/service is
> reporting these messages - a firewall, imap daemon
...?
>
They originate from my router.
> Also, the destination port is 143, so this is imap, and
not related
> to "sending" mail, which will be on port 25, 587 or
465.
>
Sure - I was thinking that they originated from my
server, but I did say that my brain refuses to go into gear
today
.
> My suspicion is that you have filtering on a firewall or
your imap
> daemon that is allowing you to connect to your imap
server from your
> non-public network ipnumber (192.168.0.7) to its
public ipnumber
> (88.97.17.41), but not to its non-public ipnumber
(192.168.0.40).
>
I think I should ignore this for today. That address
(192.168.0.7) is a dhcp address, which must have been
my laptop wifi connection, and since I had no wired
connection at the time, if there had been anything really
wrong I wouldn't have been able to use my mail, and I
would have known about it.
It probably represents a fleeting problem.
> Of course the non-public numbers don't go outside
your network, so
> there may be NATting going on (specifically in the non-
public -->
> public case) that's obscuring the issue.
>
Since it's the router, the commonality seems to rule that
out.
> By the way, you seem to have asked about this back
in March.
>
Did I ask something similar? I don't recall - but then I
don't recall what I had for breakfast yesterday. I'll look
back and see if I can find anything.
All the same, thanks to your breaking my circle of
thinking, I don't think there's really a problem. If it
occurs again I'll look more closely.
BTW, your reply-to plays havoc with normal list
behaviour.
Anne
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
