From: centos-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:centos-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of chloe K
Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2008 9:10 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: Neighbour table overflow
what is your netmask?
eth0 =
255.255.240.0
eth1 =
255.255.255.0
lo =
255.0.0.0
These
don't look right except for eth1. I have made no changes to these in about
4 years.
Thanks
Thomas Dukes <tdukes@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thomas Dukes <tdukes@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Just started getting this. I tried the following by adding it to my
etc/sysctl.conf:
net.ipv4.neigh.default.gc_thresh1 = 4096
net.ipv4.neigh.default.gc_thresh2 = 8192
net.ipv4.neigh.default.gc_thresh3 = 8192
net.ipv4.neigh.default.base_reachable_time = 86400
net.ipv4.neigh.default.gc_stale_time = 86400
That pretty much locked things up.
Then I tried another googled solution:
echo 256 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/neigh/default/gc_thresh1
echo 512 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/neigh/default/gc_thresh2
echo 1024 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/neigh/default/gc_thresh3
And adding it also to etc/sysctl.conf:
net.ipv4.neigh.default.gc_thresh1 = 256
net.ipv4.neigh.default.gc_thresh2 = 512
net.ipv4.neigh.default.gc_thresh3 = 1024
Still not working.
Any ideas?
TIA
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Neighbour table overflow
- From: Robert Moskowitz
- Re: Neighbour table overflow
- From: Robert Moskowitz
- Re: Neighbour table overflow
- References:
- Neighbour table overflow
- From: Thomas Dukes
- Re: Neighbour table overflow
- From: chloe K
- Neighbour table overflow
- Prev by Date: Re: Neighbour table overflow
- Next by Date: Re: Neighbour table overflow
- Previous by thread: Re: Neighbour table overflow
- Next by thread: Re: Neighbour table overflow
- Index(es):