Karanbir Singh wrote: > Xen isnt going anywhere - Redhat and others have put in major efforts > into making it work and as far as I can see, while kvm might be a far > superior platform, its only an 'alternative' platform. Not the > replacement one. http://searchservervirtualization.techtarget.com/news/article/0,289142,sid94_gci1322965,00.html With only 20,000 lines of code, KVM is simpler to develop and maintain than the 300,000-line Xen, he added. "The best judge of the better hypervisor is the Linux community," Schnaider said. "And the momentum is shifting from Xen to KVM," with Red Hat and Ubuntu both announcing adoption of KVM, he said. [..] Cathrow cautioned, however, that although Red Hat will continue to develop new features for both platforms, it "might not make sense" to incorporate all the latest enhancements in Xen, he said. "Xen's been a great solution, but KVM offers more innovation and faster features," Cathrow said. "Technology moves forward, and KVM is the future." -- nate _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos