On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 2:15 PM, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 14:10 -0500, Marc G. wrote:Unfortunately no. The facilities are defined at the C level; see man 3
> Thanks. Can any of the syslog alternatives be configured to have more
> local facilities than what's available in syslog (I think syslog-ng
> has the same problem) ?
syslog for more details.
--
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos