Dag Wieers wrote on Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:23:56 +0100 (CET):
> The reason we have a perl-DBD-mysql is because that is the upstream name
> and the naming convention dictates to use the upstream name. That is the
> only reliable way for not having RPM clashes.
But was it necessary to obsolete perl-DBD-MySQL? The older versions (up to
4.007) obviously didn't and there was no priorities problem until then
(with 4.008). There was another package (I don't recall the name, python
stuff?) that had the same problems recently. I agree that check_obsoletes
should have been in the yum config in the first place, but on first glance
and from my point of view as just being a user and not a packager the
obsoletion seems to have been unnecessary.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
