On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 9:25 AM, Barry Brimer <lists@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > There are no doubt severe security issues with this method, but the OP stated > that key-authenticated sessions were not permissible. He would be better off > encouraging the powers that be to allow key-authenticated session. Absolutely! Actually, the devious mind latches onto this discussion and prompts the OP to provide a demonstration.... Non-destructive, of course.... ;^) mhr _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Can expect do this?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Can expect do this?
- From: MHR <mhullrich@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 09:44:32 -0800
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <1226424351.4919c01f0091b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <574d6c740811110142w5364638bw93420e04b8aaa59b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0811110702170.24414@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <f4e013870811110858g5a06a35fy6d3adfecfec59eac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1226424351.4919c01f0091b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References:
- Can expect do this?
- From: Fajar Priyanto
- Re: Can expect do this?
- From: Barry Brimer
- Re: Can expect do this?
- From: MHR
- Re: Can expect do this?
- From: Barry Brimer
- Can expect do this?
- Prev by Date: help with CBL spam rejection
- Next by Date: Re: Sync of csgfs and current centos 4 updates
- Previous by thread: Re: Can expect do this?
- Next by thread: Re: Can expect do this?
- Index(es):
 |