Gordon McLellan wrote: > I guess I'm saying, if you interpret the name "Serial Attached Scsi" > literally, then the Seagate ES.2 is not an SAS drive - it is not a > scsi drive with a serial interface. However, if you interpret SAS as > an interface standard, then the interface board determines what the > drive is, more so than its mechanical construction. SAS and SATA use the same physical interface, the drive mentioned is most definitely SATA. Largest SAS drive I have heard of myself is 400GB, same as the max size for FC drives. nate _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos