Les, That's pretty much my problem. I was hoping to kill two birds with one stone here. First order of business is to replace the single drive with a raid array. Second order was to replace a single iscsi server with duo of machines. If one machine had some sort of non-recoverable problem, the other could pick-up the torch and carry on, even if that means I need to "flip a switch" to make it happen. Gordon On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > But, I think the OP's real problem is that everything is tied to one single > large drive (i.e. the software mirroring is mostly irrelevant as well as the > controller type). These would get you a queue of outstanding commands > compared to a SATA, but if you want a big difference in throughput or less > latency when multitasking you really have to split things over a bunch of > drives, either with some other type of raid or explicitly mounting different > filesystems so you can control which things compete for the disk head > position. > _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos