Re: HA Storage Cookbook?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Les,

That's pretty much my problem.  I was hoping to kill two birds with
one stone here.  First order of business is to replace the single
drive with a raid array.  Second order was to replace a single iscsi
server with duo of machines.  If one machine had some sort of
non-recoverable problem, the other could pick-up the torch and carry
on, even if that means I need to "flip a switch" to make it happen.

Gordon





On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> But, I think the OP's real problem is that everything is tied to one single
> large drive (i.e. the software mirroring is mostly irrelevant as well as the
> controller type).  These would get you a queue of outstanding commands
> compared to a SATA, but if you want a big difference in throughput or less
> latency when multitasking you really have to split things over a bunch of
> drives, either with some other type of raid or explicitly mounting different
> filesystems so you can control which things compete for the disk head
> position.
>
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux