Re: Question re RHEL 5.3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



MHR  wrote:

> I've heard now from more than one source about problems
> with CentOS
> (and RH) at least up through 5.2 w.r.t. SATA drive
> handling, and I've
> even reported on this myself in this list before.
> 
> My question is, do we have any idea if 5.3 has any
> improvements in this area?
> 
> One of my cohorts here, who happens to be a Fedora fan,
> says that
> these problems are fixed in F9, but I have grave concerns
> about
> putting an enterprise lifeline main application on any
> Fedora release.
>  If 5.3 solves these issues, I'd much rather go with
> that.
> 

You seem to be relying on hearsay and rumor-mongering.
Any bug reports you have filed on the CentOS bug tracker?

> Any ideas?  Any places I might look to see for myself?
> 

You have to install 5.3 beta and test it yourself. Then
again if your "alleged problems" only surface in a 
conversation with your "fedora buddy" you have to have 
more than your word for it.

Comprende?

Spike.


      

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux