Spike Turner wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
It is not about you ... please stop bring a complete ass.
I edit the CentOS main page ... and you know what, there
are only so
many hours in a day, where I have to do $work so I can eat
and pay for
my house, as well as spend 40-60 hours a week on a free
project so you
can have a free operating system that you do not
appreciate. So that
you can then tell me that I do not do enough things for
free to suit
your taste ... you know what ... i do not give a flying
F$$$ what you
think. I do not care at all ... not one tiny little bit.
Nope, nada,
don't care ... I CAN'T HEAR YOU ... LA LA LA LA
The main CentOS page is there to explain the product and
provide links,
The main website is not our major concern,
though we
would like it to be up2date, and did try to update it.
If you don't like it .. GREAT .. please move to another
distro that has
more tolerance for whining, non-appreciative, 12 year-old
antics.
Calm down Johnny, don't lose it. Some constructive criticism
should be welcomed. I thought the withholding of kernel updates
for two weeks and the non-update of the CentOS webpage were a
deliberate action by the same individual(s) but I may have been
wrong.
I would not like CentOS to go the same way as Whitebox and 10-20
devs "should" in a community share the roles rather than leaving
it all to one person.
Spike.
Whew!!!! Thanks Johnny... that was way past due.
Spike?
'S'uperfluous 'P'ain 'I'n 'K'eester 'E'veryday
When the word 'constructive' is used in front of 'criticism', it is
meant as "promoting improvement or development", not the construction of
a volcano. Either that or you've been confusing the many political ad
tactics with 'promotion'?
John Hinton
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
