Bill Campbell wrote: > >> There are two possible buffer limits one could encounter: tty driver >> input line buffer (which is not an issue for bash because readline >> avoids it) and kernel exec space for the arguments plus environment >> passed to a new process. Only the second one causes the error message >> that started this thread, and previous posts have pointed out that >> recent Linux kernels have effectively removed that limit (see message >>from Jeremy Sanders). > > While current Linux kernels may have removed the limit, It's probably a mistake to say that the limit is removed. I think this change just moves the limiting factor elsewhere - to the RAM or virtual memory that happens to be available. > this has > been a common issue on all *nix systems for decades, which is why > xargs was written. Recognizing that you do not have infinite buffer space available is a good thing. Keep using xargs. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx